Some links on this page are affiliate links. We may earn a commission when you click through and make a purchase, at no additional cost to you.
The WordPress Plugins Team has released its latest activity report, shedding light on the state of plugin submissions and approvals as of March 2, 2026. With 513 plugins requested and 197 approved, the team faces a significant backlog, including 4423 plugins currently in the review queue. This snapshot highlights the challenges and trends shaping the plugin ecosystem.
Key Takeaways
- The Plugins Team approved 197 new plugins out of 513 submissions last week.
- There are currently 4423 plugins in the review queue, 3757 of which are older than seven days.
- Help Scout data shows Monday as the busiest day, with 142 conversations handled per day on average.
- Authors are responsible for delays in 3464 pending plugins, awaiting their responses.
- Reviewer workload remains high, with 328 plugins pending and no email sent yet.
Plugin Submission and Approval Metrics
Between February 23 and March 1, the Plugins Team processed 513 new plugin submissions, rejecting 173 and closing 36. The approval rate for this period stands at approximately 38%, aligning with historical averages. However, the volume of submissions continues to grow, putting pressure on the review team.
Recommended for Site owners, developers, agencies
Wordfence — from $119/yr
Visit Wordfence →Some links on this page are affiliate links. We may earn a commission when you click through and make a purchase, at no additional cost to you.
The current queue comprises 4423 plugins, with 3757 older than seven days. Of these, 3464 are pending due to unresponsiveness from authors, while 328 are waiting on reviewers with no email communication initiated yet. This data underscores the systemic bottlenecks in plugin reviews, exacerbated by both author-side delays and resource constraints on the reviewer side.
Help Scout Insights
The report also includes Help Scout metrics, which track communication between reviewers and plugin authors. Last week saw 1137 total conversations, with 487 new queries and 371 emails created. Monday emerged as the busiest day, averaging 142 conversations per day. These figures illustrate the scale of communication required to manage the plugin review pipeline.
Messages received totaled 751, while reviewers sent 1886 replies—a ratio that highlights the iterative nature of plugin reviews and the importance of clear, actionable communication.
Challenges in the Plugin Review Process
The complexity of plugin reviews often extends beyond technical evaluations. Authors frequently fail to respond promptly to reviewer feedback, as evidenced by the 3464 plugins awaiting author input. This delay not only impacts the authors themselves but also compounds the workload for reviewers.
Additionally, the 328 plugins pending without email communication point to inefficiencies in initiating the review process. These gaps suggest a need for better workflow automation or increased staffing to handle submissions more efficiently.
What This Means for WordPress Users
For plugin developers, these statistics underscore the importance of timely communication with the review team. Delayed responses can significantly extend the approval timeline, affecting launch schedules and user adoption. Developers should prioritize responding to reviewer queries promptly and thoroughly.
Site operators should remain vigilant about plugin security and quality. The high rejection rate serves as a reminder to scrutinize plugins before installation, ensuring they meet security and compatibility standards. Leveraging tools like the Wordfence CLI Vulnerability Scanner can help identify risks proactively.
For agencies and freelancers, these trends highlight the need to plan for longer lead times when relying on new plugins. Building contingency plans around plugin updates and approvals can mitigate potential project delays.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is the plugin review queue so large?
The queue size reflects increasing plugin submissions and systemic delays, including unresponsiveness from authors and resource constraints on reviewers.
How can plugin authors speed up approvals?
Authors should respond promptly to reviewer feedback, address issues thoroughly, and ensure submissions meet WordPress coding standards.
What tools can site owners use to vet plugins?
Tools like the Wordfence CLI Vulnerability Scanner and the WordPress Plugin Directory reviews can help site owners assess plugin security and quality.
Are plugins rejected solely for technical reasons?
No. Plugins can be rejected for security concerns, lack of originality, or failure to comply with directory guidelines.
